Review



meg data analysis  (MathWorks Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol MathWorks Inc is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 96
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    MathWorks Inc meg data analysis
    Each trial began with a fixation-cross at the screen centre, followed by a “starting box” on the left. Fixating on the starting box would trigger the sentence onset. Participants ( n = 42) were instructed to read 188 sentences silently and then gaze at the “ending box” at the screen bottom to trigger the sentence offset. Randomly, 25% of trails included a simple comprehension question requiring a button response. Each sentence contained one or two target words, either of low or high lexical frequency. The target words were unpredictable from the prior context and all sentences were plausible. RIFT was applied by continuously flickering rectangle patches underneath the target and post-target words at frequencies f t and f p respectively (60 and 65 Hz sine waves, balanced across participants). A Gaussian mask was applied over the patch to smooth the sharp luminance changes around the edges to reduce their visibility across saccades. Two discs were positioned at the bottom corners of the screen, with their luminance oscillating at sine waves of f t and f p separately throughout the entire trial. These discs were covered by two photodiodes, and, during sentence presentation, their luminance changes mirrored those of the patches beneath the flickering words. Eye tracker and <t>MEG</t> <t>data</t> were acquired simultaneously. ITI, inter-trial interval.
    Meg Data Analysis, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 2335 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/meg data analysis/product/MathWorks Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 2335 article reviews
    meg data analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    96/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Parallel and dynamic attention allocation during natural reading"

    Article Title: Parallel and dynamic attention allocation during natural reading

    Journal: bioRxiv

    doi: 10.1101/2025.05.27.656336

    Each trial began with a fixation-cross at the screen centre, followed by a “starting box” on the left. Fixating on the starting box would trigger the sentence onset. Participants ( n = 42) were instructed to read 188 sentences silently and then gaze at the “ending box” at the screen bottom to trigger the sentence offset. Randomly, 25% of trails included a simple comprehension question requiring a button response. Each sentence contained one or two target words, either of low or high lexical frequency. The target words were unpredictable from the prior context and all sentences were plausible. RIFT was applied by continuously flickering rectangle patches underneath the target and post-target words at frequencies f t and f p respectively (60 and 65 Hz sine waves, balanced across participants). A Gaussian mask was applied over the patch to smooth the sharp luminance changes around the edges to reduce their visibility across saccades. Two discs were positioned at the bottom corners of the screen, with their luminance oscillating at sine waves of f t and f p separately throughout the entire trial. These discs were covered by two photodiodes, and, during sentence presentation, their luminance changes mirrored those of the patches beneath the flickering words. Eye tracker and MEG data were acquired simultaneously. ITI, inter-trial interval.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Each trial began with a fixation-cross at the screen centre, followed by a “starting box” on the left. Fixating on the starting box would trigger the sentence onset. Participants ( n = 42) were instructed to read 188 sentences silently and then gaze at the “ending box” at the screen bottom to trigger the sentence offset. Randomly, 25% of trails included a simple comprehension question requiring a button response. Each sentence contained one or two target words, either of low or high lexical frequency. The target words were unpredictable from the prior context and all sentences were plausible. RIFT was applied by continuously flickering rectangle patches underneath the target and post-target words at frequencies f t and f p respectively (60 and 65 Hz sine waves, balanced across participants). A Gaussian mask was applied over the patch to smooth the sharp luminance changes around the edges to reduce their visibility across saccades. Two discs were positioned at the bottom corners of the screen, with their luminance oscillating at sine waves of f t and f p separately throughout the entire trial. These discs were covered by two photodiodes, and, during sentence presentation, their luminance changes mirrored those of the patches beneath the flickering words. Eye tracker and MEG data were acquired simultaneously. ITI, inter-trial interval.

    Techniques Used:



    Similar Products

    product data sheets  (ATCC)
    98
    ATCC product data sheets
    Product Data Sheets, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/product data sheets/product/ATCC
    Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    product data sheets - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    98/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    meg data analysis  (MathWorks Inc)
    96
    MathWorks Inc meg data analysis
    Each trial began with a fixation-cross at the screen centre, followed by a “starting box” on the left. Fixating on the starting box would trigger the sentence onset. Participants ( n = 42) were instructed to read 188 sentences silently and then gaze at the “ending box” at the screen bottom to trigger the sentence offset. Randomly, 25% of trails included a simple comprehension question requiring a button response. Each sentence contained one or two target words, either of low or high lexical frequency. The target words were unpredictable from the prior context and all sentences were plausible. RIFT was applied by continuously flickering rectangle patches underneath the target and post-target words at frequencies f t and f p respectively (60 and 65 Hz sine waves, balanced across participants). A Gaussian mask was applied over the patch to smooth the sharp luminance changes around the edges to reduce their visibility across saccades. Two discs were positioned at the bottom corners of the screen, with their luminance oscillating at sine waves of f t and f p separately throughout the entire trial. These discs were covered by two photodiodes, and, during sentence presentation, their luminance changes mirrored those of the patches beneath the flickering words. Eye tracker and <t>MEG</t> <t>data</t> were acquired simultaneously. ITI, inter-trial interval.
    Meg Data Analysis, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/meg data analysis/product/MathWorks Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    meg data analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    96/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    meg phantom data analysis  (Takeda)
    90
    Takeda meg phantom data analysis
    Each trial began with a fixation-cross at the screen centre, followed by a “starting box” on the left. Fixating on the starting box would trigger the sentence onset. Participants ( n = 42) were instructed to read 188 sentences silently and then gaze at the “ending box” at the screen bottom to trigger the sentence offset. Randomly, 25% of trails included a simple comprehension question requiring a button response. Each sentence contained one or two target words, either of low or high lexical frequency. The target words were unpredictable from the prior context and all sentences were plausible. RIFT was applied by continuously flickering rectangle patches underneath the target and post-target words at frequencies f t and f p respectively (60 and 65 Hz sine waves, balanced across participants). A Gaussian mask was applied over the patch to smooth the sharp luminance changes around the edges to reduce their visibility across saccades. Two discs were positioned at the bottom corners of the screen, with their luminance oscillating at sine waves of f t and f p separately throughout the entire trial. These discs were covered by two photodiodes, and, during sentence presentation, their luminance changes mirrored those of the patches beneath the flickering words. Eye tracker and <t>MEG</t> <t>data</t> were acquired simultaneously. ITI, inter-trial interval.
    Meg Phantom Data Analysis, supplied by Takeda, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/meg phantom data analysis/product/Takeda
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    meg phantom data analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    raw opm-meg data  (Elekta)
    90
    Elekta raw opm-meg data
    Each trial began with a fixation-cross at the screen centre, followed by a “starting box” on the left. Fixating on the starting box would trigger the sentence onset. Participants ( n = 42) were instructed to read 188 sentences silently and then gaze at the “ending box” at the screen bottom to trigger the sentence offset. Randomly, 25% of trails included a simple comprehension question requiring a button response. Each sentence contained one or two target words, either of low or high lexical frequency. The target words were unpredictable from the prior context and all sentences were plausible. RIFT was applied by continuously flickering rectangle patches underneath the target and post-target words at frequencies f t and f p respectively (60 and 65 Hz sine waves, balanced across participants). A Gaussian mask was applied over the patch to smooth the sharp luminance changes around the edges to reduce their visibility across saccades. Two discs were positioned at the bottom corners of the screen, with their luminance oscillating at sine waves of f t and f p separately throughout the entire trial. These discs were covered by two photodiodes, and, during sentence presentation, their luminance changes mirrored those of the patches beneath the flickering words. Eye tracker and <t>MEG</t> <t>data</t> were acquired simultaneously. ITI, inter-trial interval.
    Raw Opm Meg Data, supplied by Elekta, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/raw opm-meg data/product/Elekta
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    raw opm-meg data - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    meg data  (MathWorks Inc)
    96
    MathWorks Inc meg data
    Each trial began with a fixation-cross at the screen centre, followed by a “starting box” on the left. Fixating on the starting box would trigger the sentence onset. Participants ( n = 42) were instructed to read 188 sentences silently and then gaze at the “ending box” at the screen bottom to trigger the sentence offset. Randomly, 25% of trails included a simple comprehension question requiring a button response. Each sentence contained one or two target words, either of low or high lexical frequency. The target words were unpredictable from the prior context and all sentences were plausible. RIFT was applied by continuously flickering rectangle patches underneath the target and post-target words at frequencies f t and f p respectively (60 and 65 Hz sine waves, balanced across participants). A Gaussian mask was applied over the patch to smooth the sharp luminance changes around the edges to reduce their visibility across saccades. Two discs were positioned at the bottom corners of the screen, with their luminance oscillating at sine waves of f t and f p separately throughout the entire trial. These discs were covered by two photodiodes, and, during sentence presentation, their luminance changes mirrored those of the patches beneath the flickering words. Eye tracker and <t>MEG</t> <t>data</t> were acquired simultaneously. ITI, inter-trial interval.
    Meg Data, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/meg data/product/MathWorks Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    meg data - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    96/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    f igure 1 mesoscale model of meg data  (Meso Scale Diagnostics LLC)
    90
    Meso Scale Diagnostics LLC f igure 1 mesoscale model of meg data
    Each trial began with a fixation-cross at the screen centre, followed by a “starting box” on the left. Fixating on the starting box would trigger the sentence onset. Participants ( n = 42) were instructed to read 188 sentences silently and then gaze at the “ending box” at the screen bottom to trigger the sentence offset. Randomly, 25% of trails included a simple comprehension question requiring a button response. Each sentence contained one or two target words, either of low or high lexical frequency. The target words were unpredictable from the prior context and all sentences were plausible. RIFT was applied by continuously flickering rectangle patches underneath the target and post-target words at frequencies f t and f p respectively (60 and 65 Hz sine waves, balanced across participants). A Gaussian mask was applied over the patch to smooth the sharp luminance changes around the edges to reduce their visibility across saccades. Two discs were positioned at the bottom corners of the screen, with their luminance oscillating at sine waves of f t and f p separately throughout the entire trial. These discs were covered by two photodiodes, and, during sentence presentation, their luminance changes mirrored those of the patches beneath the flickering words. Eye tracker and <t>MEG</t> <t>data</t> were acquired simultaneously. ITI, inter-trial interval.
    F Igure 1 Mesoscale Model Of Meg Data, supplied by Meso Scale Diagnostics LLC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/f igure 1 mesoscale model of meg data/product/Meso Scale Diagnostics LLC
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    f igure 1 mesoscale model of meg data - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    meg data (elekta neuromag triux tm)  (Elekta)
    90
    Elekta meg data (elekta neuromag triux tm)
    Each trial began with a fixation-cross at the screen centre, followed by a “starting box” on the left. Fixating on the starting box would trigger the sentence onset. Participants ( n = 42) were instructed to read 188 sentences silently and then gaze at the “ending box” at the screen bottom to trigger the sentence offset. Randomly, 25% of trails included a simple comprehension question requiring a button response. Each sentence contained one or two target words, either of low or high lexical frequency. The target words were unpredictable from the prior context and all sentences were plausible. RIFT was applied by continuously flickering rectangle patches underneath the target and post-target words at frequencies f t and f p respectively (60 and 65 Hz sine waves, balanced across participants). A Gaussian mask was applied over the patch to smooth the sharp luminance changes around the edges to reduce their visibility across saccades. Two discs were positioned at the bottom corners of the screen, with their luminance oscillating at sine waves of f t and f p separately throughout the entire trial. These discs were covered by two photodiodes, and, during sentence presentation, their luminance changes mirrored those of the patches beneath the flickering words. Eye tracker and <t>MEG</t> <t>data</t> were acquired simultaneously. ITI, inter-trial interval.
    Meg Data (Elekta Neuromag Triux Tm), supplied by Elekta, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/meg data (elekta neuromag triux tm)/product/Elekta
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    meg data (elekta neuromag triux tm) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Each trial began with a fixation-cross at the screen centre, followed by a “starting box” on the left. Fixating on the starting box would trigger the sentence onset. Participants ( n = 42) were instructed to read 188 sentences silently and then gaze at the “ending box” at the screen bottom to trigger the sentence offset. Randomly, 25% of trails included a simple comprehension question requiring a button response. Each sentence contained one or two target words, either of low or high lexical frequency. The target words were unpredictable from the prior context and all sentences were plausible. RIFT was applied by continuously flickering rectangle patches underneath the target and post-target words at frequencies f t and f p respectively (60 and 65 Hz sine waves, balanced across participants). A Gaussian mask was applied over the patch to smooth the sharp luminance changes around the edges to reduce their visibility across saccades. Two discs were positioned at the bottom corners of the screen, with their luminance oscillating at sine waves of f t and f p separately throughout the entire trial. These discs were covered by two photodiodes, and, during sentence presentation, their luminance changes mirrored those of the patches beneath the flickering words. Eye tracker and MEG data were acquired simultaneously. ITI, inter-trial interval.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Parallel and dynamic attention allocation during natural reading

    doi: 10.1101/2025.05.27.656336

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Each trial began with a fixation-cross at the screen centre, followed by a “starting box” on the left. Fixating on the starting box would trigger the sentence onset. Participants ( n = 42) were instructed to read 188 sentences silently and then gaze at the “ending box” at the screen bottom to trigger the sentence offset. Randomly, 25% of trails included a simple comprehension question requiring a button response. Each sentence contained one or two target words, either of low or high lexical frequency. The target words were unpredictable from the prior context and all sentences were plausible. RIFT was applied by continuously flickering rectangle patches underneath the target and post-target words at frequencies f t and f p respectively (60 and 65 Hz sine waves, balanced across participants). A Gaussian mask was applied over the patch to smooth the sharp luminance changes around the edges to reduce their visibility across saccades. Two discs were positioned at the bottom corners of the screen, with their luminance oscillating at sine waves of f t and f p separately throughout the entire trial. These discs were covered by two photodiodes, and, during sentence presentation, their luminance changes mirrored those of the patches beneath the flickering words. Eye tracker and MEG data were acquired simultaneously. ITI, inter-trial interval.

    Article Snippet: The MEG data analysis was conducted using MATLAB R2020a (Mathworks Inc, USA), incorporating the FieldTrip toolbox (version 20200220; Oostenveld et al., 2011), the FLUX MEG analysis pipeline , and custom-made scripts.

    Techniques: